I've spent some time
mulling over the comments made by Rob and Lamb in repsonse to my post
discussing how the SG trade is best suited to goals later rather than earlier
in a match. The points made are very valid, and it occurs to me that entering
most trades at the beginning of a match might not be the most efficient way to
leverage these scorelines.
The whole premise of
the trade is that there are two (relatively) evenly matched teams, and that the
expectation is that there will be around 3 goals in total. Assuming this
assessment proves to be accurate the obvious question is 'when do we expect the
goals to be scored?' Unfortunately my crystal ball is still back at the
dealer's undergoing warranty repairs, so I am unable to find the answer!
However, experience tells me and intuition suggests that in a close contest the
early stages are likely to consist of some probing and pushing, both teams
feeling the other out like two boxers testing each other for reach, strengths
and weakensses. In qualifying games I am working on the assumption that most
will still be 0-0 after 30 minutes.
At the half hour mark
the 1-1 price will have barely moved at all, whilst 1-2 and 2-1 will have
drifted a little bit, as would 2-2. But three other scores would have steamed
quite a bit - namely 0-0 1-0 and 0-1. There seems little point to me in getting
involved with 0-0. If the game is destined to end that way, so be it. With the
possible exception of people actively trading 0-0 as a speciality it is any
correct score trader's nightmare - so my intention it to ignore it.
I have therefore
formulated a little trial and it works like this. I am going to back 1-0 0-1
and 1-1 at the outset for a fiver each. If the game is still 0-0 at half an
hour I will then add 1-2, 2-1 and 2-2 to the mix with £2 stakes, taking
whatever odds might be available to me. If the match is still goalless at half
time I reckon that by greening both 0-1 and 1-0 that I'd be able to cover the
£6 stakes on 1-2 2-1 and 2-2 or pretty close to it. I'd then have a properly
formed SG, including 2-2, owing me the princely sum of around a fiver. I know
from experience that matches with a goalless first half often result in good
wins for the SG, so that would be a great situation to be in.
That leaves two other
possibilities. Firstly that a goal goes in before the second tranche of bets
have been placed. Unless the goal is ridiculously early I reckon the trade should
be scratchable if desired by greening both the odd goal score and the 1-1. My
more probable course of action, however, would be to hold fire, let both
scores' odds steam a bit more and then re-assess. Obviously at that stage I run
the risk of 0-2 or 2-0 and a wipeout from what could still have ended up being
a winning trade.
What about a goal
after the second tranche of bets have been placed but before half time? The
answer, I suspect, depends on the scoring team.
If the home team or
favourites (which could, of course, be the away team) score first then my
inclination would be to let the whole trade run for a while. The one goal score
and would continue to steam, and 1-1 would probably stay roughly where it is,
maybe even drifting a little bit. With the passage of time, unless the market
believes the leaders are totally dominant, 1-1 will start to come in as well. I
think that whatever might happen later I'd green 1-0 / 0-1 once the entire £10
invested on those two scores could be recouped - in other words I'd be in the
same position that I would have had using the old method, the difference being
I'd have better odds on 1-2 and 2-1 as well as having 2-2 covered.
If the away team or
the underdogs were to score first it is my belief that the trade would then be
in a fantastic position. After letting the market settle it would not surprise
me to find that a decent green screen could be achieved there and then if
desired, maybe leaving a nice big lump on 2-2. But that is probably not the
route I'd take... The 0-1 1-0 would have been backed at higher odds than the
same score on the favorites / home team so almost certainly I'd green that
score as soon as the market had re-settled and then proceed in time honoured
fashion.
Most of the above is,
at this stage, conjecture. Unfortunately the month end pub quiz beckons this
evening so I won't be able to try it during the mid evening matches and haven't
decided whether or not to trade the late Latin American games. But I am sitting
here having written this post with an air of optimism for this ammendment to
what I believe is already a winning trade.
Time will tell....
I have really enjoyed reading your blog and thought I would contribute. I have been trading the SG over the last couple of weeks with mixed results. My most profitable trades came by just covering 1-1 1-2 and 2-1 then placing 2-2 after 25mins - 30 mins or when the price hits around 25s. I tried the alternative method of backing 1-0 0-1 and 1-1 but kept getting burnt after early goals in all but one of my matches. The one match where it was 0-0 at half time ended 1-0 but had already traded out at half time which halved the liabilities but didn't cover it completely. Looking back I would have left the 1-0 and 0-1 on and let them steam until 70 mins or so . if no goal by 70 mins or if one goes in then green up. I have therefore decided to knock the 1-0 0-1 strategy on the head. Will continue to do this especially in the south American games. Getting on qualifying games in south America where it's 0-0 at half time can pay handsomely. Anyway this are my findings. Good luck.
ReplyDeleteFunnily enough I have concluded much the same thing, although I'll occasionally trade a sort of hybrid of the original with the Mk II thrown in for good measure.
ReplyDeleteI agree wholeheartedly with your second point, although my preference with 0-0 half times is to back 1-1, 2-0 and 0-2. This of course is essentially the same as backing over 1.5 goals, but you can usually achieve better combined odds on the Correct Score market.